top of page

Don’t Take Any Cruises to Venezuela: Trump Just Ordered a Mass Killing at Sea


Welp, we can officially add murderer to Trump’s long rap sheet of egregious crimes. On September 2, 2025, the Trump administration unleashed the U.S. military on a small Venezuelan vessel in the southern Caribbean, blowing it out of the water and killing 11 human beings.


Trump claimed—without proof—that the passengers were drug runners. Normally, when suspected narcotics traffickers are spotted on the open seas, the Coast Guard intercepts, boards, and arrests them. That’s how the law works. But Trump decided due process was optional. He labeled them criminals and had them executed at sea.



A New Precedent: Shoot First, Justify Later


The strike followed an expanded U.S. military deployment near Venezuela, framed as a “counter-drug campaign.” But let’s be clear: this wasn’t interdiction, it was annihilation.


Even seasoned experts were alarmed. Legal scholars quickly pointed out that the United States has never before used airstrikes to blow up suspected drug vessels. Boarding and seizure? Yes. Arrests and trials? Yes. Bombing eleven people to death in international waters? Never.


The administration didn’t present evidence of drugs, weapons, or an imminent threat. All we have is Trump’s word. And that word, historically, has never been worth much.



Crimes Against Humanity?


Killing without trial is not “justice.” It’s murder. And under international law, it could constitute a crime against humanity.


Executive Order 12333—still the law of the land—prohibits assassinations. International law prohibits the use of lethal force except in self-defense or within the confines of war. But this wasn’t war. It was a one-sided ambush in open waters.


So when Trump congratulates himself for “taking out narco-terrorists,” what he’s really admitting is that he ordered the extrajudicial execution of 11 people.


The International Criminal Court (ICC) exists to prosecute precisely this type of abuse. But because the United States refuses to recognize ICC authority, accountability is elusive. Venezuela could file a complaint—but the political barriers are enormous.



What Comes Next


For ordinary people, this raises terrifying possibilities. The Caribbean just became a more dangerous place, especially for anyone traveling by sea. Cruise passengers, fishing crews, even cargo ships could find themselves caught in the crosshairs of a militarized drug war with no rules.


And here at home, the precedent is darker still: if the president can order the U.S. military to bomb people at sea without proof, trial, or oversight, what’s to stop him from using that same unchecked power on land? From labeling his political enemies as “terrorists” and sending in the military?


Trump’s strike in the Caribbean wasn’t about narcotics. It was about showing the world he can kill without consequence. And unless he’s held accountable, this won’t be the last time.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page